FluidGrids vs Make
The visual-canvas benchmark for no-code automation. See how FluidGrids compares on builder, embedding, versioning, recovery, and pricing.
What Make is
Make (formerly Integromat) offers a best-in-class visual scenario canvas with routers, iterators, and aggregators, a full white-label OEM product, and — since February 2026 — AI Agents on every plan. What it still has no answer for is version control: there is no built-in versioning or rollback.
Founded: 2012 · Prague, Czech Republic · www.make.com
Strengths
- Best-in-class free-form visual canvas
- 3,000+ app integrations
- Affordable entry pricing on the credit model
- Full white-label OEM product
- Make AI Agents (GA February 2026) available on every plan
- EU data residency and GDPR-native
Weaknesses
- No built-in version control or rollback
- No natural-language scenario generation
- Weighted credits can be hard to predict
- No self-hosting (On-Prem Agent only)
- White-label is a separate cloud tenant, not components in your app
Feature comparison
Head-to-head across the dimensions that matter for visual workflow automation.
| Dimension | FluidGrids | Competitor |
|---|---|---|
Builder paradigm | Free-form React Flow canvas — branching, loops, parallel paths, drop-on-edge insert, inline quick-config, sticky notes | Best-in-class scenario canvas with routers, iterators and aggregators |
Connector catalog Competitor | 30 store nodes live in the builder (21 third-party connectors) plus 21 built-in flow-control nodes, and growing | 3,000+ app integrations |
Triggers Competitor | Manual/API, webhook, cron schedule, hosted form, and error triggers (a run can start when another workflow fails) | Instant, scheduled and polling triggers across the catalog |
Workflow versioning FluidGrids | Immutable version on every save; runs pin to their exact version; restore any version into a fresh draft | No built-in version control or rollback |
Run recovery FluidGrids | Cancel, pause, resume, terminate — plus retry a single failed node with its original inputs | Scenario replay and error-handler routes; no single-module retry |
Observability & logs | Live per-node state plus a streaming run log, including whatever your own Code nodes print | Execution history with per-module input/output inspection |
Dashboard ETL FluidGrids | A single data sink node streams any workflow’s output into a live BigConsole dashboard feed | Data stores and Make Grid; no dashboard sink |
Embeddable builder | React SDK at three integration depths — no iframe, no FluidGrids branding — plus a public read-only embed viewer | Full white-label OEM — a separate cloud tenant under your brand |
AI agents & LLM nodes Competitor | AI Agent node with chat-model, memory and tool sub-nodes; any workflow can be bound as an agent tool | Make AI Agents (GA Feb 2026) on every plan, plus AI modules |
AI-assisted generation FluidGrids | Describe a workflow in the assistant and get a builder-ready draft; a second mode builds a whole connector node from a prompt | No natural-language scenario generation |
Multi-tenancy | Workspace-native isolation with gateway-enforced RBAC, audit and metering inherited from the Burdenoff platform | Teams and organizations; per-tenant orgs on the OEM product |
Deployment | Fully managed cloud; no self-hosted edition | Managed cloud; On-Prem Agent for local resource access only |
Enterprise compliance Competitor | Encrypted credentials, RBAC, audit trail, SSO; formal SOC 2 / HIPAA attestations not yet in hand | SOC 2, GDPR and EU data residency |
Pricing model FluidGrids | Usage-based runs; features ungated across tiers | Credits, weighted by module complexity |
Pricing comparison
How FluidGrids' run-based model stacks up against Make's billing.
| Plan | FluidGrids | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | $0 · 1,000 runs/mo | 1,000 credits/mo · 2 active scenarios |
| Entry paid | $19/user/month · 10,000 runs | Core ~$9/mo · 10,000 credits |
| Mid tier | $49/user/month · unlimited runs | Pro ~$16/mo · Teams ~$29/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
Make moved from operations to a weighted credit model in 2026: most actions cost one credit, but AI modules and advanced features consume more based on processing complexity. FluidGrids meters per run. FluidGrids list prices are published at fluidgrids.ai/pricing.
Why FluidGrids wins
Specific advantages for teams comparing Make and FluidGrids.
Version control and rollback (shipped)
Make has no built-in versioning. FluidGrids creates an immutable version on every save and can copy any prior version into a new draft without touching live runs.
Surgical run recovery (shipped)
When a Make scenario fails you replay it or branch to an error handler. FluidGrids exposes retry, resume, pause, and cancel operations — retry a single failed node with its original inputs instead of re-running the scenario.
Components in your app vs. a separate tenant (shipped)
Make’s white-label is a cloud tenant you send users to. FluidGrids embeds as React components inside your existing app, under your router, theme, and sign-in — so automation looks like a feature you built, not a destination you link to.
Describe it and get a draft (shipped)
Make has no natural-language scenario generation. The FluidGrids assistant turns a plain-language description into a builder-ready workflow draft — and a second mode generates an entire connector node from a prompt.
Want versioning with your canvas?
Start free on FluidGrids and get visual workflow automation with immutable versions, surgical recovery, and a React SDK you can embed natively.