FluidGrids vs Make
The visual-canvas benchmark for no-code automation. See how FluidGrids compares on builder, embedding, versioning, recovery, and pricing.
What Make is
Make (formerly Integromat) offers a best-in-class visual scenario canvas with routers, iterators, and aggregators, a full white-label OEM product, and — since February 2026 — AI Agents on every plan. What it still has no answer for is version control: there is no built-in versioning or rollback.
Founded: 2012 · Prague, Czech Republic · www.make.com
Strengths
- Best-in-class free-form visual canvas
- 3,000+ app integrations
- Affordable entry pricing on the credit model
- Full white-label OEM product
- Make AI Agents (GA February 2026) available on every plan
- EU data residency and GDPR-native
Weaknesses
- No built-in version control or rollback
- No natural-language scenario generation
- Weighted credits can be hard to predict
- No self-hosting (On-Prem Agent only)
- White-label is a separate cloud tenant, not components in your app
Feature comparison
Head-to-head across the dimensions that matter for visual workflow automation.
| Dimension | FluidGrids | Competitor |
|---|---|---|
Builder paradigm | Free-form React Flow canvas — branching, loops, parallel paths, drop-on-edge insert, inline quick-config, sticky notes | Best-in-class scenario canvas with routers, iterators and aggregators |
Connector catalog Competitor | 30 store nodes live in the builder (21 third-party connectors) plus 21 built-in flow-control nodes, and growing | 3,000+ app integrations |
Triggers Competitor | Manual/API, webhook, cron schedule, hosted form, and error triggers (a run can start when another workflow fails) | Instant, scheduled and polling triggers across the catalog |
Workflow versioning FluidGrids | Immutable version on every save; runs pin to their exact version; restore any version into a fresh draft | No built-in version control or rollback |
Run recovery FluidGrids | Cancel, pause, resume, terminate — plus retry a single failed node with its original inputs | Scenario replay and error-handler routes; no single-module retry |
Observability & logs | Live per-node state plus a streaming run log, including whatever your own Code nodes print | Execution history with per-module input/output inspection |
Dashboard ETL FluidGrids | A single data sink node streams any workflow’s output into a live BigConsole dashboard feed | Data stores and Make Grid; no dashboard sink |
Embeddable builder | React SDK at three integration depths — no iframe, no FluidGrids branding — plus a public read-only embed viewer | Full white-label OEM — a separate cloud tenant under your brand |
AI agents & LLM nodes Competitor | AI Agent node with chat-model, memory and tool sub-nodes; any workflow can be bound as an agent tool | Make AI Agents (GA Feb 2026) on every plan, plus AI modules |
AI-assisted generation FluidGrids | Describe a workflow in the assistant and get a builder-ready draft; a second mode builds a whole connector node from a prompt | No natural-language scenario generation |
Multi-tenancy | Workspace-native isolation with gateway-enforced RBAC, audit and metering inherited from the Burdenoff platform | Teams and organizations; per-tenant orgs on the OEM product |
Deployment | Fully managed cloud; no self-hosted edition | Managed cloud; On-Prem Agent for local resource access only |
Enterprise compliance Competitor | Encrypted credentials, RBAC, audit trail, SSO; formal SOC 2 / HIPAA attestations not yet in hand | SOC 2, GDPR and EU data residency |
Pricing model FluidGrids | Usage-based runs; features ungated across tiers | Credits, weighted by module complexity |
Pricing comparison
How FluidGrids' run-based model stacks up against Make's billing.
| Plan | FluidGrids | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 1,000 runs/mo (indicative) | 1,000 credits/mo · 2 active scenarios |
| Entry paid | ~$19/mo · 10,000 runs | Core ~$9/mo · 10,000 credits |
| Mid tier | ~$49/mo · unlimited runs | Pro ~$16/mo · Teams ~$29/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
Make moved from operations to a weighted credit model in 2026: most actions cost one credit, but AI modules and advanced features consume more based on processing complexity. FluidGrids meters per run. FluidGrids pricing is indicative and unpublished until launch.
Why FluidGrids wins
Specific advantages for teams comparing Make and FluidGrids.
Version control and rollback (shipped)
Make has no built-in versioning. FluidGrids creates an immutable version on every save and can copy any prior version into a new draft without touching live runs.
Surgical run recovery (shipped)
When a Make scenario fails you replay it or branch to an error handler. FluidGrids exposes retry, resume, pause, and cancel operations — retry a single failed node with its original inputs instead of re-running the scenario.
Components in your app vs. a separate tenant (shipped)
Make’s white-label is a cloud tenant you send users to. FluidGrids embeds as React components inside your existing app, under your router, theme, and sign-in — so automation looks like a feature you built, not a destination you link to.
Describe it and get a draft (shipped)
Make has no natural-language scenario generation. The FluidGrids assistant turns a plain-language description into a builder-ready workflow draft — and a second mode generates an entire connector node from a prompt.
Want versioning with your canvas?
Start free on FluidGrids and get visual workflow automation with immutable versions, surgical recovery, and a React SDK you can embed natively.