Industry Solutions1 illustrationPart of 1 industry solution

Trade Deduction Matching and Disputes

Each retailer deduction matched to its promotion agreement, delivery proof or sales report, with valid lines cleared and disputes drafted.

These images are illustrations of the concept, not screenshots of the actual product.

Overview

This concept is a FluidGrids workflow for the deductions retailers take from their payments to a consumer goods supplier. Trade promotions, shortages, damaged goods and on-time-in-full fines are often settled by the retailer simply paying less, and every deducted line has to be checked, cleared or disputed before the retailer's dispute window closes. The design envisions one run per remittance that sends every line down the right path.

In FMCG and consumer goods, deduction checking tends to live in spreadsheets, with the evidence spread across promotion agreements, delivery records and the retailer's sales reports. Valid claims wait as long as invalid ones, and a shortage claim that a delivery record would have disproved can slip past the window because nobody found the proof in time.

The illustration shows the Retailer Deduction Matching workflow on the builder canvas, on an active version with Validate and Run controls. A remittance-received trigger for a sample grocery retailer carries its deduction lines into PDF extraction, a match against two promotion agreements on file and a step that reads the retailer's sales report for a range of weeks, while a proof-of-delivery lookup in MoveTheWheels feeds in from above. A versioned deduction rule then routes each line. Matched promotion lines are cleared against the agreement; scan rebates the sales report agrees with are cleared as rebates; shortages where the proof of delivery shows full delivery become a drafted dispute with that proof attached; on-time-in-full fines go to an appointment check that waits for an analyst's decision; and lines with no match go to analyst review. Every path carries a sample line count and ends in a BigConsole DataSink for the deductions ledger. A side panel sums up today's run with lines read, cleared, disputes drafted and lines awaiting an analyst, warns that the dispute window closes in a few days and names the largest open claim, and the logs end with a warning that shortage claims contradict the delivery record.

Two other Burdenoff products take part by design. MoveTheWheels is designed to supply the proof of delivery kept on each shipment, so shortage, damage and on-time-in-full claims are tested against what was actually delivered. BigConsole is designed to receive the results, along with retailer sales, through the DataSink, giving finance and trade marketing one ledger of what was cleared, disputed and still open. The weekly sales report itself is designed to be collected by a separate scheduled workflow. FluidGrids holds the extraction, the versioned rule and the pause for anything the rule cannot decide, so analysts spend their time on the lines that need judgment.

What this concept shows

  • A remittance trigger that starts a run with the retailer's deduction lines, read through PDF extraction
  • Matching of promotion lines against the promotion agreements on file
  • A MoveTheWheels proof-of-delivery lookup, designed to test shortage, damage and on-time-in-full claims against what was delivered
  • A retailer sales report step for scan-based rebate lines, covering a range of weeks
  • A versioned deduction rule with labeled routes for promotion matched, scan rebate agreed, shortage contradicted by delivery, on-time-in-full fine and no match
  • Drafted disputes with the proof of delivery attached, and analyst steps for fines and unmatched lines
  • A BigConsole DataSink for the deductions ledger at the end of every path
  • A run summary with lines read, cleared, disputes drafted and awaiting analyst, a dispute window countdown and the largest open claim

How it works

  1. A remittance arrives and starts the run with its deduction lines.
  2. PDF extraction reads each line, and promotion lines are matched to the trade promotion agreements on file.
  3. Shortage, damage and on-time-in-full lines are checked against the MoveTheWheels proof of delivery, and scan rebate lines against the retailer's weekly sales report.
  4. The versioned deduction rule clears matched promotion and rebate lines.
  5. Where the delivery record contradicts a shortage claim, the run drafts a dispute with the proof attached.
  6. On-time-in-full fines and unmatched lines wait for an analyst's decision.
  7. Every outcome is designed to land in the BigConsole deductions ledger for finance and trade marketing.

Who it's for

  • Deductions and accounts receivable analysts
  • Trade marketing and revenue management teams
  • Finance controllers at consumer goods suppliers
  • Customer logistics and order-to-cash teams
  • Finance automation teams

Illustrations

1 illustration of this concept. Select one to view it full size.

Deduction Matching Workflow with Rule-Routed Outcomes

A versioned rule routes each deduction line using agreements, delivery proof and sales, with today's run beside it.

The illustration shows the FluidGrids builder with a Retailer Deduction Matching workflow on an active version, with Validate and Run controls and a Node Palette of schedule and webhook triggers, a governed query, a rule, approval and wait actions and a DataSink output. On the canvas, a remittance-received trigger with a sample line count feeds PDF extraction of deduction lines, a match against two promotion agreements and a retailer sales report for a range of weeks, with a MoveTheWheels proof-of-delivery lookup joining from above. A versioned deduction rule splits the lines five ways: clear against agreement, clear rebate, draft dispute with the proof of delivery attached, an appointment check that waits for an analyst, and analyst review for no match, each with a count. All paths end in a BigConsole DataSink for the deductions ledger. A side panel summarizes today's run and warns that the dispute window closes soon, and the logs end with a warning that shortage claims contradict proof of delivery.

Topics

  • retailer deduction management
  • trade promotion deduction matching
  • deduction dispute automation
  • shortage claim proof of delivery
  • OTIF fine dispute workflow
  • scan-based rebate reconciliation
  • remittance deduction extraction
  • CPG deductions workflow
  • FMCG trade spend reconciliation
  • accounts receivable deductions automation

Part of an industry solution

This concept appears in a cross-product solution on burdenoff.com — see how it works alongside other Burdenoff products to solve a problem in that industry.

We use cookies for essential site functions and, with your consent, for analytics to improve FluidGrids. We don't use advertising or cross-site tracking cookies. See our Cookie Policy.

Preferences